Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: confusing archive_command example

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example
Date: 2010-03-31 23:45:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > As far as "...", those are used to show only the important changes in
> > the string, which I think is the right approach, but I did change the
> > line so the dots are not right up against slashes:
> > 	archive_command = 'test ! -f ... %f &amp;&amp; cp %p ... %f'
> This is *not* an improvement, because it makes it look like the %f is a
> separate command argument.  Please revert if you can't think of
> something better.

What about:

 	archive_command = 'test ! -f ...%f &amp;&amp; cp %p ...%f'

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-31 23:46:49
Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-31 23:44:15
Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group