Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Date: 2010-03-02 00:27:39
Message-ID: 201003011727.39481.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:25, Ed L. wrote:
> On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:23, Ed L. wrote:
> > On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > "Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> > > > On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> user(at)host shouldn't be a problem, but if there were an
> > > >> @ by itself or starting a token, it might possibly
> > > >> cause something like this.
> > > >
> > > > There is one, looks like a typo got in. How do I fix
> > > > it?
> > >
> > > Hmm, a user named @, or what?
> >
> > Yes, a bogus user:
> >
> > "@" "" ""
>
> Correction. Here's the line:
>
> "@" "" "" "agent_group"

It is the first line in the pg_auth file.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed L. 2010-03-02 00:36:40 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-02 00:26:30 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed L. 2010-03-02 00:36:40 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-02 00:26:30 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)