Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: buildfarm breakage

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: buildfarm breakage
Date: 2010-02-16 17:05:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan p??e v po 08. 02. 2010 v 20:07 -0500:
> > 
> > Our Solaris *moth members seem to have stopped building. Have we lost them?
> Hi Andrew,
> The answer is not simple. Yes, we lost Solaris 8 and 9 machines which
> was reinstalled and now they are used for different purpose. It was
> planned before the April and I announced it long time ago. It
> unfortunately happed and timing looks strange. And I did not find
> replacement.
> I have replacement for nevada/x86 machine already, but I need to setup
> it which is one item in my very long TODO list :(. Solaris 10 Sparc/x86
> and nevada sparc are covered at this moment.

I think we have to accept the inevitable result that Postgres support on
Solaris is going to diminish over time.  We certainly are going to get
less support from Sun/Oracle, and one day the use of Postgres might even
be obstructed on Solaris or void software support contracts.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-02-16 17:11:24
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL::PLPerl::Call - Simple interface for calling SQL functions from PostgreSQL PL/Perl
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2010-02-16 16:35:30
Subject: Re: Explain buffers display units.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group