Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
Date: 2010-02-16 16:13:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > * Listen / Notify rewrite.  This is the only one of the remaining
> > patches that is not marked as Ready for Committer, but I think it
> > would be good if someone (probably Tom) at least took a look at it.
> > I'm not sure if it's committable at this point, but we should at least
> > try to provide some good feedback.
> I will look at this one.  It'd be nice to get it in if at all possible,
> because the existing listen/notify infrastructure won't play very nicely
> with HS --- eg, inspecting pg_listener on the slave might yield the
> false impression that some of the slave-side backends had active LISTENs
> because of chance matches of PID.

Good point.  Is pg_listener the only place we expose PIDs in heap files?
I know we expose them in views but those are not affected by HS, I

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2010-02-16 16:22:31
Subject: Re: OpenVMS?
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-02-16 16:09:15
Subject: Re: ToDo: plpgsql plugin for query and expression verification

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group