Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Explain buffers display units.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,"<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Explain buffers display units.
Date: 2010-02-16 14:36:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark escribió:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> > Upon further review, I also notice that this patch seems to have
> > falsified the EXPLAIN documentation - both the description of the
> > BUFFERS option and the description of the FORMAT option are no longer
> > accurate
> Oops. Well, I would like to know if I'm in the minority and have to
> roll this back before I fix that.

My personal opinion is that displaying number of blocks in all EXPLAIN
formats is more consistent.  What are you going to do with YAML output
anyway, which is machine readable yet some people prefer over our legacy
text format?

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2010-02-16 14:50:12
Subject: Re: Problem with 8.4 stats collector high load
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-02-16 14:31:44
Subject: Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group