From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | ecpg.addons |
Date: | 2009-11-26 16:00:28 |
Message-ID: | 20091126160028.GA2816@feivel.credativ.lan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote a hackish little script that checks if all rules in ecpg.addons are
indeed used to create the precompiler's parser to catch renamed symbol and
similar changes. Now I wonder whether this should be added to the build
process. If it is, the buildfarm will catch every such change, not just the
ones breaking the regression tests. However, this might also make the buildfarm
become red if only a very minor and unimportant change is not syncronized.
Any comment?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-26 16:07:54 | Re: cvs chapters in our docs |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-11-26 15:56:39 | Re: cvs chapters in our docs |