| From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Syntax for partitioning | 
| Date: | 2009-11-25 08:17:43 | 
| Message-ID: | 20091125171743.92A1.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Here is an updated partitioning syntax patch.
It implements syntax described here:
    http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning#Syntax
Changes:
  * New syntax: ALTER TABLE parent ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION.
  * Partition keys accepts an opclass name instead of an operator.
  * "lo <= key AND key < hi" is used in range check constraints instead of
    "key >= lo AND key < hi".
ToDo items:
  * pg_get_partitiondef(parentOid, in_alter_format) might be ugly.
    It was designed only for psql -d and pg_dump. It might be cleaner
    if we move SQL formatter from the core function to client tools.
      In psql: pg_get_partitiondef(oid, false)
        Partitions: RANGE (sales_date)
        (
            PARTITION sales_2006 VALUES LESS THAN '...',
            ...
            PARTITION sales_max VALUES LESS THAN MAXVALUE
        )
      In pg_dump: pg_get_partitiondef(oid, true)
        ALTER TABLE parent PARTITION BY RANGE (sales_date);
        ALTER TABLE parent ATTACH PARTITION sales_2006 VALUES LESS THAN '...';
        ...
        ALTER TABLE parent ATTACH PARTITION sales_max VALUES LESS THAN MAXVALUE;
  * The patch does not contain the following documentation,
    but I'll start writing them if the syntax is ok.
      - ddl-partitioning.sgml
      - alter-partition.sgml  (new)
      - create-partition.sgml (new)
      - drop-partition.sgml   (new)
Note:
  * In fact, malloc was not a bug because it was the code in pg_dump.
Comments welcome.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size | 
|---|---|---|
| partitioning_20091125.patch | application/octet-stream | 145.1 KB | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-11-25 08:23:13 | Re: operator exclusion constraints | 
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-11-25 07:15:15 | Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION |