Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:05:32 -0800 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Actually I would argue that for eu related merchandising it is
> > absolutely appropriate. EU/US (and other regions) are going to be
> > relatively autonomous in their needs outside of content (such as source
> > for flyers).
> Even if EU and US are autonomous (which isn't absolutely true) - what
> about other countries and continents? Do we want to establish separate
> processes in each and every country, for each conference as example? Or
> wouldn't it better to have a contact where one can ask for promotion and
> merchandising material?
I agree that having one list for merchandising seems the right way to go
about it. If a certain portion of the traffic is not applicable to you,
just don't read it. That's how all mailing lists work.
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-11-12 23:58:24|
|Subject: Re: Correct place for merchandising issues |
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2009-11-12 23:37:40|
|Subject: Re: Correct place for merchandising issues|