Re: bulk inserts

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bulk inserts
Date: 2009-09-29 15:45:55
Message-ID: 200909290845.55984@hal.medialogik.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> ?? I'm not sure what you're implying about the semantics here, but it
> doesn't seem right. COPY doesn't somehow break out of ACID semantics,
> it's only an *optimization* that allows you to get large quantities of
> data into the database faster. The main reason it's faster is because
> parsing CSV data is easier than parsing SQL.
>
> At least I think that's the only difference; anybody know better?

I think a big reason is also that the client can stream the data without
waiting for a network round trip ack on every statement.

--
"No animals were harmed in the recording of this episode. We tried but that
damn monkey was just too fast."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2009-09-29 16:01:59 Re: computed values in plpgsql
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-09-29 15:42:37 Re: computed values in plpgsql