| From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments |
| Date: | 2009-09-16 05:38:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20090916053851.GA9771@toroid.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-rrreviewers |
At 2009-09-14 21:08:56 -0400, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> Logging configuration changes
> - Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>
I reviewed this patch. It's fine. Ready for committer as-is.
But I suggested some minor changes that I thought were useful, and
posted a new version of the patch including those changes. Besides
that, I posted a patch to implement a suggestion Peter made in his
original posting.
What status should I assign the patch now? It's "Needs Review", in
a sense, but also "Waiting on Author", "Ready for Committer", and
"Returned with Feedback" ;-)
The patch is completely trivial, before and after, so I feel a bit silly
even to ask this question. Should I just advance it to "Ready"?
(I suppose my review will show up on -hackers by the time this message
shows up on -rrreviewers.)
-- ams
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-16 16:44:06 | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-15 13:55:06 | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments |