* Heikki Linnakangas (heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com) wrote:
> That's what the OP really should've complained about. If we addressed
> that, so that a generic plan was created that determines which child
> tables can be excluded at run time, there would be no need for the
> persistent plan cache.
This would definitely be nice to have.. I'm not sure what the level of
difficulty to do it is though.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: decibel||Date: 2009-09-13 22:12:19|
|Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-09-13 19:40:42|
|Subject: Re: Persistent Plan Cache|