Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Persistent Plan Cache

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joshua Rubin <jrubin(at)esoft(dot)com>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Persistent Plan Cache
Date: 2009-09-13 21:54:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
* Heikki Linnakangas (heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com) wrote:
> That's what the OP really should've complained about. If we addressed
> that, so that a generic plan was created that determines which child
> tables can be excluded at run time, there would be no need for the
> persistent plan cache.

This would definitely be nice to have..  I'm not sure what the level of
difficulty to do it is though.


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: decibelDate: 2009-09-13 22:12:19
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-09-13 19:40:42
Subject: Re: Persistent Plan Cache

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group