Re: Planner question - "bit" data types

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Date: 2009-09-06 00:15:00
Message-ID: 20090906001500.GA5101@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Karl Denninger escribió:
> Tom Lane wrote:

> > You never showed us any EXPLAIN results,
> Yes I did. Go back and look at the archives. I provided full EXPLAIN
> and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the original query. Sheesh.

You did? Where? This is your first message in this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00059.php
No EXPLAINs anywhere to be seen.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl Denninger 2009-09-06 00:19:04 Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Previous Message Karl Denninger 2009-09-05 23:39:14 Re: Planner question - "bit" data types