Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts
Date: 2009-08-19 21:02:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
> >> "# What to use to start up the postmaster (we do NOT use pg_ctl for this,
> >> # as it adds no value and can cause the postmaster to misrecognize a stale
> >> # lock file)
> >> DAEMON="$prefix/bin/postmaster"
> > 
> > And?  That statement was and remains perfectly correct.  We don't use
> > pg_ctl to start the postmaster in the Linux initscripts, either.
> Then WTF do we have pg_ctl, and why do our docs tell people to use it?

I assume on boot we _know_ there can't be another postmaster running,
while normal pg_ctl does not know that.  Perhaps we just need to state
that in the comment.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-08-19 21:03:52
Subject: Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-08-19 20:32:21
Subject: Re: fillfactor hides autovacuum parameters in 8.4.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group