Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> The vague consensus for syntax options was that the GUC
> 'lock_timeout' and WAIT [N] extension (wherever NOWAIT
> is allowed) both should be implemented.
> Behaviour would be that N seconds timeout should be
> applied to every lock that the statement would take.
Tom argues that lock_timeout should be sufficient. I'm not sure what
does WAIT [N] buy.
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bernd Helmle||Date: 2009-07-27 12:35:07|
|Subject: Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2009-07-25|
|Previous:||From: Boszormenyi Zoltan||Date: 2009-07-27 12:00:01|
|Subject: Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5|