Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: git revisited

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git revisited
Date: 2009-07-21 16:17:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 20 July 2009 23:17:30 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > I'm not sure where we got to with doing some surgery on the CVS repo so
> > that we can replicate all the tags and branches properly. Has someone
> > fully identified what needs to be fixed so we can have all the tags?
> I think this depends on which tool we would end up using to do the final 
> conversion.  Each tool has its own quirks.

Didn't someone report not long ago that there were files missing in a
checkout of some not-so-old tag that made it impossible to compile such
a tree?

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-07-21 16:20:50
Subject: Re: errcontext support in PL/Perl
Previous:From: Alexey KlyukinDate: 2009-07-21 16:15:29
Subject: Re: errcontext support in PL/Perl

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group