Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Tilmann Singer <tils(at)tils(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?
Date: 2009-07-16 04:28:47
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The most effective solution might be to revert the change in pg_migrator
> >> and instead have pg_dump interpret --binary-upgrade --schema-only to
> >> include the data for sequences.  It seems ugly as sin though :-(
> > Uh, how is this going to behave in 8.5?  Do we still dump sequences, and
> > if so, aren't we heading down the road of dumping stuff only because a
> > previous release needed it?
> In 8.5 we'll probably have it go over to treating sequences the same as
> other user tables.  What, do you think that'll be the only change
> required in pg_migrator's behavior between 8.4 and 8.5?  I think it'll
> more likely be down in the noise ...

I am just worried about jerking pg_dump around as pg_migrator's needs

> > Can we run a query that just shifts columns around in the sequence heap
> > files we migrated?
> Nope.  That's not exposed at the SQL level, even if we allowed ALTER
> TABLE on sequences (which I sure hope we don't).

Ah, I see what you mean:

	test=> create sequence xx;
	test=> select * from xx;
	 sequence_name | last_value | start_value | increment_by |     
	max_value      | min_value | cache_value | log_cnt | is_cycled |
	 xx            |          1 |           1 |            1 |
	9223372036854775807 |         1 |           1 |       1 | f         | f
	(1 row)
	test=> update xx set last_value = 3;
	ERROR:  cannot change sequence "xx"

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2009-07-16 04:49:14
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects
Previous:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2009-07-16 04:23:42
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/lite rev.2163

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Raji Sridar (raji)Date: 2009-07-16 04:59:41
Subject: Concurrency issue under very heay loads
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-07-16 04:16:23
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group