| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby |
| Date: | 2009-07-03 02:59:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20090703025934.GW4698@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió:
> Second, I am wondering whether Heikki feels that it would be useful to
> assign round-robin reviewers for this patch, or whether he's going to
> be the principal reviewer himself. We could assign either a reviewer
> (or reviewers) to the whole patch, or we could assign reviewers to
> particular chunks of the patch, such as the signal handling piece.
WRT the signal handling piece, I remember something in that area being
committed and then reverted because it had issues. Does this version
fix those issues? (Assuming it's the same patch)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2009-07-03 04:32:16 | Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby |
| Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-07-03 02:45:52 | Re: [PATCH] SE-PostgreSQL Updates rev.2096 |