| From: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Query progress indication - an implementation |
| Date: | 2009-06-29 18:33:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20090629183359.GD25336@eddie |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:07:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > So, while an actual % completed indicator would be perfect, a "query
> > steps completed, current step =" would still be very useful and a large
> > improvement over what we have now.
>
> I think this is pretty much nonsense --- most queries run all their plan
> nodes concurrently to some extent. You can't usefully say that a query
> is "on" some node, nor measure progress by whether some node is "done".
What about showing the outermost node where work has started?
--
Josh / eggyknap
End Point Corp.
www.endpoint.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-29 18:38:12 | Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-06-29 18:21:37 | Re: Query progress indication - an implementation |