On Thursday 28 May 2009 20:03:38 Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > Right. Shall we try to spec out exactly what our conversion
> > requirements are? Here's a shot:
> > Comments? Other considerations?
> Certainly sounds reasonable to me. I'd be really suprised if that's
> really all that hard to accomplish. I'd be happy to help with some
> testing too if we feel that the current git repo is in reasonable shape
> to do that testing against (or someone has another).
Sounds like writing a comprehensive test suite against Tom's spec would be the
first step. And then this test suite can be run against various conversion
tools and configurations thereof.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Sam Mason||Date: 2009-05-29 11:31:49|
|Subject: Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python|
|Previous:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2009-05-29 10:38:49|
|Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions|