Re: bytea vs. pg_dump

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date: 2009-05-29 08:06:28
Message-ID: 200905291106.28707.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 29 May 2009 04:26:35 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Added to TODO:
> |Improve bytea COPY format
>
> * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00192.php

Btw., I have started to write some code for that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-05-29 08:12:05 Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-05-29 07:16:08 Re: search_path vs extensions