| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type |
| Date: | 2009-05-28 22:26:52 |
| Message-ID: | 200905282226.n4SMQq528296@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Given that it's going to prevent users of Tsearch from
> >> upgrading-in-place, the format change ought to be giving us some serious
> >> gains. Otherwise we should put it off until we need to make other
> >> datatype changes.
>
> > No idea but now that we are in beta we would then be invalidating beta
> > tester data. The area I got stuck on is that there is no CAST behavior
> > when creating an index. We are already invalidating GIN indexes, but I
> > can't even create an index to support the old data type.
>
> It's certainly doable. Bruce is just applying the strategy he mentioned
> in our talk ;-)
Kind of --- I am stuck because we don't auto-cast for index usage like
we do for function calls and operators, so I will just keep going and
disable tsvector.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-28 22:28:14 | Re: Dtrace probes documentation |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-05-28 22:20:11 | Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type |