On Thursday 28 May 2009 03:38:49 Tom Lane wrote:
> * SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL something-else should provide our
> current snapshot-driven behavior. I don't have a strong feeling about
> whether "something-else" should be spelled REPEATABLE READ or SNAPSHOT,
> but lean slightly to the latter.
Could someone describe concisely what behavior "snapshot" isolation provides
that repeatable read does?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2009-05-28 12:43:25|
|Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions|
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2009-05-28 12:26:47|
|Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions|