Re: Feedback from recent training

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feedback from recent training
Date: 2009-04-26 18:59:41
Message-ID: 200904262059.41721.guillaume@lelarge.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Le dimanche 26 avril 2009 à 20:31:57, Simon Riggs a écrit :
> On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 17:45 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > Alphabetic seems best, whatever kind of type they are.
> >
> > No, because that mixes in the array types which we know causes
> > confusion for some users. We need to alphabetise them with the
> > non-array types, but thats likely to be messy.
>
> How about an extra radio button for Array/Non-Array? That removes the
> confusion.
>
> The appearance of alpha sort stops people from looking further down the
> list for other items.

I think Simon's right on the alphabetic sort. It's much simpler/user friendly.
I don't like the extra radio button idea, but what about submenus? something
like this:

First menu
Types
Array Types
User types

"Types" Submenu
(all internal types and pseudo-types, sorted alphabetically)

"Array Types" Submenu
(the same, but array ones, sorted alphabetically)

"User Types" Submenu
(user tables and user types)

--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2009-04-26 19:02:06 Re: Feedback from recent training
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-04-26 18:31:57 Re: Feedback from recent training