Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS
Date: 2009-04-23 21:31:39
Message-ID: 200904240031.40733.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 23 April 2009 18:14:59 Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> I'm looking on Makefile.shlib and I see there strange line:
>
> # Insert -L from LDFLAGS after any -L already present in SHLIB_LINK
> SHLIB_LINK := $(filter -L%, $(SHLIB_LINK)) $(filter -L%, $(LDFLAGS))
> $(filter-out -L%, $(SHLIB_LINK))
>
> It seems to me that one of these line are not correct.

Why not?

> But anyway I lost -R somewhere.

Use LDFLAGS_SL.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-04-23 21:33:29 Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS
Previous Message Marc Munro 2009-04-23 20:31:39 Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields