Re: performance for high-volume log insertion

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: david(at)lang(dot)hm
Cc: Glenn Maynard <glennfmaynard(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance for high-volume log insertion
Date: 2009-04-23 01:50:36
Message-ID: 20090423015036.GL8123@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

* david(at)lang(dot)hm (david(at)lang(dot)hm) wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> You're talking about round-trips to a *local* server, on the same
>> system, not a dedicated server with network round-trips, right?
>
> the use-case for a production setup for logging servers would probably
> include a network hop.

Sure, but there's a big difference between a rtt of 0.041ms (my dinky
home network) and 20ms (from my home network in Virginia to Boston). I
wasn't intending to discount latency, it can be a concen, but I doubt
it'll be 20ms for most people..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glenn Maynard 2009-04-23 02:20:41 Re: performance for high-volume log insertion
Previous Message david 2009-04-22 22:46:30 Re: performance for high-volume log insertion