| From: | Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt |
| Date: | 2009-04-10 23:28:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20090410232809.GO3775@piware.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane [2009-04-10 19:01 -0400]:
> This seems a bit handwavy --- there's a difference between the machine's
> own cert and what it thinks is a root cert.
Sure.
> How do you deal with that? If the root cert is real, how do you put
> in self-signed server certs?
I'm afraid I don't understand. If an admin replaces the default
snakeoil cert with a real one which he got signed by a CA, then of
course he would replace the standard system SSL cert (which all the
servers default to, and which is initially the snakeoil one) with the
"good" certificate. I don't see a reason why an admin would replace a
self-signed cert with another self-signed cert?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2009-04-10 23:53:52 | Re: BUG #4755: lost graphical relationship between tables in DbVis w/ new PG release |
| Previous Message | Martin Pitt | 2009-04-10 23:24:52 | Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt |