| From: | "R(dot)P(dot) Aditya" <aditya(at)grot(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brian Ghidinelli <brian(at)pukkasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres on filer via NFS |
| Date: | 2009-03-25 00:19:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20090325001929.GA25492@mighty.grot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | sfpug |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:36:30PM -0700, Brian Ghidinelli wrote:
> Sorry for the newb question around filers; is there any truth in this
> (old) recommendation re: NFS still?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/hw_performance/node11.html
>
> If not, perhaps it should have a caveat or be removed as it turns up in
> searches and threads?
>
>
> Brian, looking at NetApp FAS250 for ~40GB Postgres storage
Depending on your IO needs, running via NFS on a Netapp is perfectly feasible
and has some distinct advantages (fast backups using snapshots are the most
compelling):
http://archives.postgresql.org/sfpug/2008-06/msg00007.php
make sure you have enough NFS client threads...
Adi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Miho Ishikura | 2009-03-25 00:28:35 | Re: Resources for Postgres and MySQL comparison presentation? |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-03-24 23:57:00 | Re: Postgres on filer via NFS |