Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PGCon brand

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net
Subject: Re: PGCon brand
Date: 2009-01-12 22:58:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Monday 12 January 2009 14:10:40 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
> > I agree, though I've always wondered if a better solution would be for
> > Dan to rename his conference as PGCan (which is a play on BSDCan, his
> > other conference, and would provide even more brand identity).
> Well, right now, pgCon is the primary conference for PostgreSQL hackers.
>   Renaming it to pgCan would be tantamount to giving up that status.

Why? It didn't get that status because of the name of the thing. If you 
recall, the first developers meeting was called something like "the postgres 
annivesary summit".  There are other factors in play. And really -hackers are 
not the ones confused by all this, as they're fairly well connected, so a 
switch to BSDCan shouldn't lead to much disruption for them, while making 
things clearer for others.   

Robert Treat

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-01-12 23:18:21
Subject: Re: PgUS 2008 end of year summary
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-01-12 21:39:43
Subject: Re: PgUS 2008 end of year summary

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group