| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Please add REINDEX note to 8.3.5 release notes. |
| Date: | 2009-01-09 01:48:17 |
| Message-ID: | 200901090148.n091mHG21834@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Done, with the attached patch applied to appropriate back branches.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> In the Release Notes for 8.3.5, 8.2.11, and 8.1.15, no mention is made
> of the need to REINDEX GiST indexes for some users. Please add this
> sentence to each Migration to Version section.
>
> Please update soon; people are being confused between the apparent
> contradiction between the Release Notes and the announcement.
>
> -----------
>
> E.1.1. Migration to Version 8.3.5
>
> + If you were previously running version 8.3.4, run REINDEX on all GiST
> indexes after upgrade.
>
> -----------
>
> E.7.1. Migration to Version 8.2.11
>
> + If you were previously running version 8.2.10, run REINDEX on all GiST
> indexes after upgrade.
>
> -----------
>
> E.19.1. Migration to Version 8.1.15
>
>
> + If you were previously running version 8.1.15, run REINDEX on all GiST
> indexes after upgrade.
>
> ----------
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| /rtmp/x | text/x-diff | 2.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-01-09 13:37:17 | Re: Current docs are too comlicated for new Postgre users; thoughts on improvement |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-08 14:46:26 | Re: Incorrect description of xmax and xip in functions docs |