Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DOMAINs and CASTs
Date: 2011-11-29 15:36:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> What happened to this patch for casts on domains from June?

> Well, if we apply this, it has the possibility to break existing
> dumps.

There's also the question of whether there's really much point.
The whole question of what to do with casts on domains is hard,
and I didn't think that thread made any progress towards defining
better behavior.  I'd just as soon leave things alone until we
have an idea of what would be better.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-11-29 15:37:38
Subject: Re: DOMAINs and CASTs
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-11-29 15:31:45
Subject: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group