Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, valiouk(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, dx k9 <bitsandbytes88(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax
Date: 2008-12-16 03:13:21
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I don't find it any clearer ... I think the missing clue is that if you
> >> specify shared_buffers values in MB, you must divide the value by block
> >> size.
> > Well, the heading says "object" now so I thought it would suggest we are
> > talking about objects and not bytes.
> I'm with Alvaro: neither of those changes were improvements.

OK, I never got the change applied because of Alvaro's objection so
there is nothing to revert.   Alvaro said he has an idea for improved
wording;  I do not.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-12-16 14:43:27
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-12-16 03:12:32
Subject: Re: triggers on views?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-12-16 03:18:33
Subject: Re: stat() vs cygwin
Previous:From: Emmanuel CecchetDate: 2008-12-16 02:05:16
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Laszlo NagyDate: 2008-12-16 12:00:54
Subject: rebellious pg stats collector (reopened case)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-12-16 00:35:38
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group