Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Date: 2008-11-26 18:54:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Steve Crawford wrote:

> Obscurity should not be your *only* line of defense, but camouflage 
> helps as well. And even if it didn't, it still reduces server-load, 
> bandwidth and heaps of logfile cruft.

In order case, thankfully, there was minimal banwidth impact, but the 
server load on some of the machines was to the point of unusability ... 
again, thankfully, that didn't manifest it self on any of the postgresql 
servers, but we didn't want to take any chances of it bleeding over ...

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org                              MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype:        ICQ . 7615664

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2008-11-26 19:00:47
Subject: Re: Comments to Synchronous replication patch v3
Previous:From: Steve CrawfordDate: 2008-11-26 18:51:23
Subject: Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group