Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Date: 2008-11-26 18:54:43
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Steve Crawford wrote:

> Obscurity should not be your *only* line of defense, but camouflage
> helps as well. And even if it didn't, it still reduces server-load,
> bandwidth and heaps of logfile cruft.

In order case, thankfully, there was minimal banwidth impact, but the
server load on some of the machines was to the point of unusability ...
again, thankfully, that didn't manifest it self on any of the postgresql
servers, but we didn't want to take any chances of it bleeding over ...

Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: ICQ . 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2008-11-26 19:00:47 Re: Comments to Synchronous replication patch v3
Previous Message Steve Crawford 2008-11-26 18:51:23 Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?