| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation |
| Date: | 2008-11-25 01:42:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200811242042.13879.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 24 November 2008 09:10:29 Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >> That would defeat the point. Not that I have any great feelings either
> >> way, but fwiw, Microsoft and Oracle both create a sample database
> >> iirc.
> >
> > Last I checked, MS did it optionally only, no?
>
> Yes, but it defaults on iirc. We can emulate that behaviour in an
> installer (and do in Postgres Plus for example), but that doesn't help
> users of other distributions.
>
We actually have such a database on pgfoundry already
(http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/1719/pagila-0.10.1.zip), which i think
devrim may have packaged into an rpm; it wouldn't hurt to add it to the win32
installer, but would you feel better if it were a contrib module or
something?
--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-11-25 02:42:00 | Comments to Synchronous replication patch v3 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-25 01:20:58 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |