Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Block-level CRC checks

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date: 2008-10-02 15:57:30
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 17:17:10 Decibel! wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Doesn't some filesystems include a per-block CRC, which would
> > achieve the same thing? ZFS?
> Sure, some do. We're on linux and can't run ZFS. And I'll argue that
> no linux FS is anywhere near as tested as ext3 is, which means that
> going to some other FS that offers you CRC means you're now exposing
> yourself to the possibility of issues with the FS itself. Not to
> mention that changing filesystems on a large production system is
> very painful.

Actually we had someone on irc yesterday explaining how they were able to run 
zfs on debian linux, so that option might be closer than you think. 

On a side note, I believe there are a couple of companies that do postgresql 
consulting that have pretty good experience running it atop solaris... just 
in case you guys ever do want to do a migration or something ;-)

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Aidan Van DykDate: 2008-10-02 16:05:59
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous:From: Bob HenkelDate: 2008-10-02 15:46:25
Subject: Re: Transactions within a function body

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group