Re: stat() vs cygwin

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stat() vs cygwin
Date: 2008-06-28 14:48:04
Message-ID: 20080628144803.GA11727@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:

> > 8.3.x not because the new SSPI doesn't work yet.

> > current cygwin patch in testing is attached.
>
> I assume this is a WIP and not actually for application, right? Please
> look it over because it contains a number of pure-whitespace changes
> that make it harder to read, and that will just end up being undone by
> pgindent at a later date anyway.

The patch also seems to hint that pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket needs a
specific Cygwin implementation too (rather than patching every caller).

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-28 15:18:26 Re: interval madness ...
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2008-06-28 13:36:02 [patch] plproxy v2