Re: [HACKERS] Terminating a backend

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Terminating a backend
Date: 2008-04-13 20:04:51
Message-ID: 20080413200451.GC21979@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I have a idea --- to have pg_terminate_backend() set a PGPROC boolean
> and then send a query cancel signal to the backend --- the backend can
> then check the boolean and exit if required. I will work on a new
> version of this patch tomorrow/Monday.

That's fine, even if it fails on 0.1% of the cases, but you can't use
SIGTERM to implement that because it already has a different meaning.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-04-13 20:31:17 Re: Commit fest queue
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-04-13 20:03:20 Re: printTable API (was: Show INHERIT in \du)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-14 02:12:41 Re: [HACKERS] Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-04-13 20:03:20 Re: printTable API (was: Show INHERIT in \du)