Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: wal_sync_method as enum

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wal_sync_method as enum
Date: 2008-04-07 20:59:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Attached patch implements wal_sync_method as an enum. I'd like someone
> to look it over before I apply it - I don't have the machines to test
> all codepaths (and some of it is hard to test - better to read it and
> make sure it's right).
> In order to implement the enum guc, I had to break out a new
> SYNC_METHOD_OPEN_DSYNC out of SYNC_METHOD_OPEN where it was previously
> overloaded. This is one of the parts where I'm slightly worried I have
> made a mistake.

I took a look at this and I like it -- it seems correct as far as I can
tell, and it has the nice property that we can display the list of
values that the current platform actually support.

This thing looked a bit dubious to me at first:

> ! 	switch (new_sync_method)
>   	{

because at least some of the values are only present on some platforms.
However, I think realized that the actual values are present on all
platforms, independent of whether they represent a supported fsync
method, so this is OK.  Perhaps it would be good to add a comment on top
of the switch statement explaining this.  Otherwise looks fine.

Well, and the ereport("FIXME") needs to be improved :-)

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2008-04-07 22:28:07
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Integer datetime by default
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2008-04-07 20:58:34
Subject: Re: Headers dependencies cleanup

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group