Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Consistent \d commands in psql

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Consistent \d commands in psql
Date: 2008-03-31 21:36:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:

> BTW, should we remove the special hack that discriminates against
> showing I/O functions (or really anything that touches cstring) in \df?
> ISTM that was mostly there to reduce clutter, and this proposal solves
> that problem more neatly.  I know I've cursed that behavior under my
> breath more than once, but again maybe my usage isn't typical.


Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-03-31 21:51:09
Subject: Re: Consistent \d commands in psql
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-03-31 20:23:32
Subject: Re: POSIX shared memory support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group