Re: Cleaner API for appendStringInfoVA

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cleaner API for appendStringInfoVA
Date: 2008-03-07 20:22:20
Message-ID: 200803072022.m27KMKE04274@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Patch rejected. Sorry. Comment is:

The patch of very dubious portability and I'm not even convinced that
it'd provide a net performance improvement.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marko Kreen wrote:
> Attached patch moves decision how much more room to allocate
> from callers of appendStringInfoVA to inside the function,
> where more info is available.
>
> On systems with broken vsnprintf() it falls back
> to doubleing the buffer.
>
> Fixme: the +1 could be something larger? Aligned?
>
> --
> marko

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-03-07 20:59:17 Re: CopyReadLineText optimization
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-07 20:06:24 Re: [PATCHES] a tsearch2 (8.2.4) dictionary that only filters out stopwords