Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Date: 2008-03-05 18:53:07
Message-ID: 20080305105307.2bcce254@jd-laptop (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:30:43 -0800
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I believe there is wording that could be used that would not convey
> that sentiment.

Such as:

PostgreSQL is designed as a client / server architecture and does not
normally embed in an optimal way. Discussion of other product solutions
to the embedded problem is outside the scope of this document.


Joshua D. Drake

The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: 
PostgreSQL Community Conference:
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-03-05 19:17:17
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-05 18:36:26
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3965: UNIQUE constraint fails on long column values

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group