| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |
| Date: | 2008-03-05 17:48:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20080305094830.1082378e@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:41:26 -0800
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> Stopping there seems like a very bad idea from a public relations
> point of view. Making the suggestion generic and naming several FLOSS
> DBs as an alternative might work better.
IMO, entries last forever, for years and years even after we fix them.
I believe we should make reference that PostgreSQL is not generally
considered an embeddable platform and call it good.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-05 17:56:01 | Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-03-05 17:41:26 | Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |