Tom Lane wrote:
> I think at the time we set the current minimum -B we were still
> intending that you could run in a half meg or so SHMMAX allocation.
> That's certainly history. Maybe we should target 2 meg as the rock
> bottom minimum?
That makes sense to me. It corresponds to 128 connections under the old
arithmetic, which seems reasonable all around.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/