| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
| Date: | 2008-01-31 15:05:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200801311605.18796.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hi,
Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Tom Lane a écrit :
> We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
> version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
> error, rather than something people could override with -i.
Are you thinking about next major or minor version ? All the same?
Is there some real good reason not to dump say 8.2.6 server with the pg_dump
from an 8.2.5 installation?
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-01-31 15:13:50 | Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2008-01-31 14:55:35 | Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-01-31 15:13:50 | Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2008-01-31 14:55:35 | Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target |