Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target
Date: 2008-01-31 12:31:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Decibel! escribió:

> BTW, with autovacuum I don't really see why we should care about how
> long analyze takes, though perhaps it should have a throttle ala
> vacuum_cost_delay.

Analyze already has vacuum delay points (i.e. it is already throttled).

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2008-01-31 13:36:15
Subject: Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA?
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-01-31 11:45:55
Subject: Re: Truncate Triggers

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-01-31 13:42:12
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Previous:From: Decibel!Date: 2008-01-31 07:28:24
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group