Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died
Date: 2008-01-31 08:39:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:28:21AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 1:33 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > > Re-reading the thread ... could that last point be significant?  Are
> > > all four of these boxen set to auto-accept updates from Redmond?
> >
> > No. red_bat does not auto-accept anything.
> For future reference, my BF members do  auto-accept updates (though
> they only reboot if I tell them to). It seems like having red_bat do
> the opposite provides a useful baseline for tracking down future
> issues.
> I wonder if it would be worth adding a notes field to the BF so we can
> record this sort of detail...

+1. That should be interesting for non-win32 platforms as well... Assuming
it's not too much work, of course ;)

I have yet to see the first case where a windows update breaks PostgreSQL
in any way though, but once it happens it would be nice to have the info.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-01-31 08:42:56
Subject: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2008-01-31 08:28:21
Subject: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group