| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity |
| Date: | 2008-01-23 15:21:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20080123152130.GI4815@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> On Jan 23, 2008 11:50 AM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I just noticed something odd in the Planner constants part of the 8.2
> > and 8.3 postgresql.conf:
> > # - Planner Cost Constants -
> >
> > #seq_page_cost = 1.0 # measured on an arbitrary scale
> > #random_page_cost = 4 # same scale as above
> > #cpu_tuple_cost = 0.01 # same scale as above
> > #cpu_index_tuple_cost = 0.005 # same scale as above
> > #cpu_operator_cost = 0.0025 # same scale as above
> >
> > The "same scale as above" while we have an "arbitrary scale" on the
> > first line is a bit weird.
Do you think it should be "same arbitrary scale as above"?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-23 15:22:11 | Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Smet | 2008-01-23 12:39:19 | Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity |