| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)gmail(dot)com>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap |
| Date: | 2008-01-21 16:06:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20080121080653.09c876c6@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgeu-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:00:55 +0100
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> > I believe this cannot be left out. I am for 'b'. Companies are not
> > members. Only individuals are members.
>
> Why shouldn't it be possible to leave it out?
> (And for the record, I'm for 'b' as well, but i'd rather keep it out
> completely)
One reason would be the make it very clear exactly what the expectation
of a Companies influence within the organization will be. If you leave
it arbitrary, is essentially can be voted differently by the board at
any time.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drkae
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHlMMfATb/zqfZUUQRAudfAKCa0jzYmYRyp1ebxjsQxEEjK6eadACfcJFb
oMlUrQInSAzQH48vy0cdd7E=
=zgov
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2008-01-21 16:10:37 | Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-01-21 16:00:55 | Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap |