Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Spoofing as the postmaster

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
Date: 2007-12-29 03:23:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Agreed.  Requiring client root certificate checking is heavy-handed.
> There seems to be some confusion here.  I didn't think anyone was
> proposing that we force every installation to require client root
> certificate checking.  What was under discussion (I thought) was
> providing the ability for a DBA to *choose* to require it.

Oh, yea, that would be OK.  I am a little worried that the extra
configuration required to turn this on/off might be added complexity for
little gain.

It might be simpler to allow the administrator to control whether
non-checking clients are logged, rather than refusing the connection.  I
think this makes it clearer the root client check is to make sure all
your clients are doing it right, rather than an actual security
enhancement (if that makes sense).

> > Of course I am not sure anyone knows how to get that information from
> > SSL.
> Yeah, if OpenSSL doesn't support testing for this then the discussion
> is moot...


  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-12-29 03:44:49
Subject: Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-12-29 03:10:18
Subject: Re: Spoofing as the postmaster

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group