| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgindent issue with EXEC_BACKEND-only typedefs |
| Date: | 2007-12-21 14:25:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200712211425.lBLEPhO23830@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I don't know how to make it output the symbol names like it seems to do
> for you.
>
> Having the typedef list in the script itself seems like a barrier for
> other people to contribute to this thing. I wonder if that can be
> changed so that the typedef is on a separate list.
Done and committed.
> (Why are we still distributing pgjindent anyway?)
Removed.
> I am also wondering if current GNU indent is now better suited to the
> task. Perhaps the bugs that it had on earlier versions have since been
> fixed? I remember checking the source code size a couple of years ago
> and it had grown by an order of magnitude or something like that.
Yes, we should give that another try. I will keep this as an 8.4 item.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-12-21 14:29:04 | Re: pgindent issue with EXEC_BACKEND-only typedefs |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-12-21 14:13:32 | Re: function body actors (was: viewing source code) |