Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"

From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
Date: 2007-12-13 06:50:45
Message-ID: 200712130750460000@854623032 (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
> Just FYI, it's going to be difficult to replace the name of the feature in 
> the PR docs at this point; I already have 11 translations.  What's *wrong* 
> with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it 
> for 6 months?

Are you saying the PR was 'string freezed' before rc1? And before the actual backend? I wonder how reasonable that really is...

That said we shouldn't change things around for no reason. IKn this case I think there was good motivation.


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-12-13 11:45:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2007-12-13 02:10:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-12-13 07:08:35
Subject: Re: Slow PITR restore
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-12-13 06:41:32
Subject: Re: Slow PITR restore

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group